Volkl has always garnered high marks for each of their skis we’ve reviewed. From the Volkl Nunataq and Volkl 100Eight skis to the lighter V-Werks inspired V-Werks BMT 109 and V-Werks Katana Skis. Each of these skis was designed with a distinct purpose and are all unique in their own right.
Volkl's new Mantra V.Werks Skis are a combination of the aggressive performance found in the V-Werks Katana Skis and the tourability and lightweight of the V-Werks BMT 109's. This qualifies the Mantra V.Werks as a ‘quiver of one’ ski that can rip resort laps as good as it can session backcountry bowls all the while making every turn as fun as the last. While not technically designed as a backcountry-specific ski, the Mantra V.Wekrs carbon jacket and wood core are light enough to keep you happy even though this is a high-performance freeride ski at heart. More on this in the rest of the review below.
Watch the following video for an overview of the Volkl V.Werk Mantra Skis.
What makes the Mantra V.Werks Skis different from other Volkl skis we’ve reviewed is their over all shape. At just 99mm underfoot their moderate width is by no means fat, but also doesn’t sacrifice buoyancy in deep snow. The 135mm tips quickly taper to 99m underfoot before flaring out again in the back to 117mm. This provides a responsive and fun 23m turn radius which is ideal for trees and backcountry couloirs.
A progressive tip rocker blends into camber underfoot before returning to a subtle tail rocker. This provides an ideal profile for float in powder and grip with aggressive turns on groomers, while also remaining stable when things get spicy.
The 3D.Ridge Carbon Construction is what’s most noticeable on the Mantra V.Werks Skis. Thick in the centre and thinner at the edges for impressive torsional stiffness and a reduced swing weight making them stable with out adding unnecessary weight. A Titanal insert is integrated into the core to again keep things light while also dampening the skis. The heart of the skis are a milled multi-layer wood core consisting of a combination of beech and poplar with the hard beech wood found in the binding mount area and the lighter poplar in the rest fo the ski. On the underside you’ll find durable P-Tex 4500 bases for smooth gliding on various snow conditions.
Volkl’s Ice.Off Topsheet is designed to keep snow and ice from adhering to the top of the ski which will keep it as light as possible while skinning up
If the V.Werks version of the Mantra isn’t to your liking or budget then consider the Volkl M5 Mantra which was the starting place for the super light Mantra V.Werks Skis. While the M5 Mantra doesn’t have the 3D.Ridge design, nor the full carbon top sheet, it does have carbon in the tips along with the titanium inserts to strengthen the skis—which are also found on the V.Werks version. The M5 Mantra, however, is only 96mm underfoot and not 99 like the V.Werks version. Even though the M5 Manta is a little shorter at 184cm it still weighs quite a bit more than the V.Werks version at 2,130g. Given they share the same Mantra name, these two skis are quite different in design and performance.
Having had a multi-year love affair with the V-Werks Katana Skis I was hesitant to give up their generous dimensions for something much more slender such as the Mantra V.Werks. While these two skis share the same turn radius, the Mantra V.Werks are considerably narrower ski by 7/13/15mm which explains much of its weight savings of over 200g. By contrast, the V-Werks BMT 109 Skis have a larger turn radius by a full 3.5m and thus far less shape but their weight matches almost identical to that of the Mantra V.Werks. The V-Werks BMT 109 Skis also have similar dimensions to the Mantra V.Werks except for underfoot where the BMT’s have a full 10mm more width.
As you can see by the numbers above, the Mantra V.Werkss falls in between and the V-Werks Katana which is one of my favourite all-time in-bounds ski and the V-Werks BMT 109 which is one of the all-time best backcountry skis. The Mantra V-Werks have the ideal shape to rail turns on groomers (which they do with ease) and thanks to their camber underfoot they have more pop and less slarve on the turns than both the V-Werks Katana and V-Werks BMT 109’s which both poses a full rocker profile. Turn initiation is effortless on the Mantra V-Werks and they like to pop out of one turn and go into the next linking up turns with ease thanks to the reasonable amount of camber underfoot. I found myself craving very aggressive, fast GS turns on groomers relying on the Mantra V.Werk’s torsional stiffness to provide all the bite I would ever need. Laying these skis on edge and redlining them is super fun as they like the speed as much as the V-Werks Katana Skis do. I was constantly surprised at how stable the Mantra V.Werks could be at speed with only minimal tip chatter given the length of their early rise tips and how light they are.
With less weight and surface area than skis I normally ride I was apprehensive that I would be happy with the Mantra V.Werks on powder days but having carved my way through a few already I can say that the large shovel combined with the early rise makes them float to the surface no matter how deep which is surprising considering they are only 99mm underfoot. It’s this reduced underfoot dimension that makes them so easy and fun to turn in conjunction with a reduced swing weight as a by product of the 3D.Ridge Carbon construction. This 3D.Ridge Carbon construction also keeps them light and responsive meaning they are fun and spontaneous on the hill and also easy to tour with.
I mounted the Volkl Mantra V.Werks Skis with a pair of Marker’s new Kingpin M-Werks 12 Bindings which is the ultimate pairing for these skis. You get a super direct and strong power transmission through the binding to the ski and the new M-Werks are lighter than previous versions of the Kingpins so it makes for an ideal resort and touring set up.
Overall, as you’d guess by now, I’m smitten with the Mantra V.Werks. They instill confidence at all speeds and thanks to their lightweight carbon construction they're perfect for touring beyond the boundaries. A quiver of one ski? Yes.
PROS:
|
CONS:
|
Price: $1,229.95CAN / $1,149US
Lengths: 170, 178, 186
Weight: 1.74kg / 3.8lb (186cm length, per ski)
Dimension: 135-99-117mm
Turn Radius: 23m (186cm length)
Powder Performance 1.5/2 Groomer Performance 2/2 Stability 2/2 Weight 2/2 Value 1.5/2 |
Did we miss something? Are we totally out to lunch? Let us know what you think. People like/dislike gear for different reasons so chime in below and we'll get a well-rounded evaluation. You'll need to login or register before you can comment but it only takes a few seconds, then you're good to go.
Copyright © 2023-24 Backcountry Skiing Canada. All Rights Reserved.
The 188cm Ripstick 96 Black comes in at an impressive 1660g's, about 100g's lighter per ski than the 186cm VW-Mantra.
However, I can't find any intel on how the two skis compare in downhill performance. As a bigger guy (6'4", 185lbs), I'm willing to carry some extra weight for a stronger, damper ski with a bit higher speed limit. I would very much appreciate your advice!
Last thing, I saw that the V Werks Katana has a recommended mount point that is -14cm from center. Is the recommended mount point similarly far back on the VW Mantra? Did you experiment with mounting forward of the line?
The Ripsticks we tested were 106 underfoot and not the 96 version so they were considerably wider than the 99 underfoot Mantra V Werks. This added girth helped make the Ripsticks more stable in variable terrain but also not as versatile when snow was lacking. I imagine the 99mm version of the Ripsticks would be a much more fair comparison.
The Mantra V Werks use Volkl's very thin and torsionally stiff V Werk construction which keeps the ski super light at just 3.48kg per pair with the Ripsticks being about the same weight thanks to their lightweight construction. Since you are 185 and heavier than I am I would suggest a ski that can accommodate that weight which in my books means a fatter ski such as the Ripstick 106's but if you live where you don't get much pow then this added width may not be that handy.The Mantra V Werks are a powerful ski especially for their weight and limited width, they carve and love to go fast whereas the Ripsticks are a little less power-packed yet still enjoy speed. I would qualify the Ripsticks as more of a crossover compared to the sports car performance of the Mantra V Werks. If you are into pure carving with less snow and most of your time is spent on groomers and lighter pow days then the Mantra is a hoot. If you wish to get into more chop, deep pow days and need an all-round ski then the Ripstick may be the one for you.
I always mount skis centre so that I can compare them apples to apples, -14cm sounds like a bit much and I am hoping you mean -14mm? The Katana is a much more powerful ski than either the Mantra or the Ripstick so I can see why that is suggested.
Ok, so it sounds like the VW Mantra may be the stiffer ski?
My only concern with the Ripsticks is multiple reports that suggest the tips are very soft and this hampers skiing fast in variable snow. These reports may be overblown though.
Between the Ripstick and the V-Werks Mantra, which ski would you say has a more "damp" feel?
As far as mount mount points, I'm totally with you. I always mount my bindings on the recommended line and have never really given this much thought (figure it's worth trusting the ski designer here).
However, the Volkl V-Werks Katana recommended line is located -14cm from the center of the ski, which is exceptionally far back. I know many Katana owners felt compelled to mount at least 1 or 2 cm's ahead of the recommended line because they felt it was too far back on the ski. I can't help but wonder if the V-Werks Mantra has a similarly far back mount point as the Katana, but I can't find the official info anywhere. For comparison, the Ripstick 96 recommended mount point is -8cm from true center, and Ripstick 106 is -10cm from true center.
Do you mean 1.4cm or 14mm back from center for the Volkl V-Werks Katana? 14cm sounds like a bit much! :) I typically go centre mounted unless the manufacturer recommends otherwise as I like to test the skis as they suggest.
So I just wanted to share my honest opinion with you: I just don't understand how in your reviews v-werks Katana scored 2/2 in "Groomer Performance" and "Stability", while the Mantra got 1.5/2 in both of these categories! I think it's very misleading, as I believe the ratings should be exactly the opposite :)
I happen to own both, V-Werks (Katana and Mantra). I actually sold the Katana last year, after direct comparison between two of them where Mantra consistently smoked the Katana on groomers, carving ability, and stability. Both mounted with Kingpins 12. I'm an expert skier, used to race, and done some coaching. I understand that you might have knocked some points off Mantra for "powder performance" (Mantra being narrower and stiffer than Katana), even though I can't support that in real world PNW powder experience I had with both. But the "groomer performance" and "stability" - sorry! You are out to lunch on that :) Even based on these two skis construction/specs numbers alone, Mantra should beat Katana any day on groomers/stability (which is reflected in my tests).
I also noticed that your individual ratings for the v-werks Mantra are not even adding up to 9 total rating, so maybe there is a math error in the review.
My ratings for these 2 skis would be 9.5 for Mantra, and 8.5 for Katana, using your scale.
I''m eager to try the Findr 102 that you scored 10/10, as I'm looking to replace my 94 BMT for ski mountaineering/volcano ski touring. If you also could suggest something around that width (~102-105),while being lighter weight than Mantra, I would greatly appreciate it.Thanks and Happy Holidays!