Study looks at whether trekking poles help or hinder
To pole, or not to pole? That is the question...data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11691/11691cbc81ebd5de701cdd64e4ecc604ba218c5a" alt=""
Now you may not have asked this question, or maybe you have, but there are certainly many who have debated the subject of poles for a long time. Poles for skiing seems a given but poles for tracking and running are a more contentious topic. I remember when I went on my first multi-day trek, poles were on the packing list so I brought them without question. The second year, I left them behind and found I would move way faster, but missed the support on steep downhill sections. Now I seem not to take them at all but I thought it to be merely a preferential kind of thing.
Well, it may indeed still be a matter of preference, but we need not rely strictly on anecdotal evidence any longer. A comparative study has been done and it turns out that while walking without a load, trekking poles decrease the load to lower extremities but increase the cardiovascular demand. When carrying a large load, poles may increase balance while decreasing lower extremity muscle activity.
So there you have it, the science is in and poles offer benefits whether you are carrying a large bag or not. Need more? You can find the study on pubmed and get into all the details.